LynnBlakeGolf Forums

LynnBlakeGolf Forums (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/index.php)
-   Golf By Jeff M (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=152)
-   -   MFT swing (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6300)

Jeff 12-19-2008 08:53 PM

MFT swing
 
Do you think that his ideas about a MFT swing make sense from a TGM perspective?

http://www.aroundhawaii.com/lifestyl...ful-swing.html

Jeff.

Hennybogan 12-20-2008 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59183)
Do you think that his ideas about a MFT swing make sense from a TGM perspective?

http://www.aroundhawaii.com/lifestyl...ful-swing.html

Jeff.

JEFF,

I've been reading your stuff for a couple of years, this is the first peice of real meat I've read, It harkens HK's words. 4-1-2-3. You might click on the author to read all articles.

Jeff 12-20-2008 12:57 AM

HB

So this MFH theory resonates with you?

He states-: "The second firing needs to be really explosive and it needs to drive you through the last 90 degrees of hip rotation till the end of the swing.

In a biomechanical graph, this means that Tiger has two velocity peaks for his hips and shoulders. His second hip velocity peak occurs just prior to impact and this "slingshots" his shoulders (2nd firing) into the ball with maximum force. Ben Hogan did this as well.

But Jamie's swing is even more violent and powerful. His hips and shoulders reach their 2nd velocity peaks right at impact. All of this adds to his speed AND effective mass at impact. The added mass of his body firing at high speed right at impact will add to his smash factor and higher ball speeds at impact. This is sledgehammering at its finest."

Does this theory seem sensible? Does the idea of firing the hips/shoulders again before impact increase ball flight distance? How? Could you provide the causal link explanation that I obviously cannot grasp. How does the added mass of the body increase smash factor and produce higher ball speeds?

He stated-: "If your hips and shoulders slow down too early in the downswing (because no one told it to fire again), then naturally conservation of angular momentum takes over and all speed and energy goes to the hands. Voila! We are casting! At the very least, without one's shoulders firing at high speeds at impact, we get a hand flip. It just can't be helped. We flip because we don't fire our hips and shoulders again."

So, do you believe that a failure to fire the hips and shoulders again leads to hand flipping?

Jeff.

12 piece bucket 12-20-2008 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59192)
HB

So this MFH theory resonates with you?

He states-: "The second firing needs to be really explosive and it needs to drive you through the last 90 degrees of hip rotation till the end of the swing.

In a biomechanical graph, this means that Tiger has two velocity peaks for his hips and shoulders. His second hip velocity peak occurs just prior to impact and this "slingshots" his shoulders (2nd firing) into the ball with maximum force. Ben Hogan did this as well.

But Jamie's swing is even more violent and powerful. His hips and shoulders reach their 2nd velocity peaks right at impact. All of this adds to his speed AND effective mass at impact. The added mass of his body firing at high speed right at impact will add to his smash factor and higher ball speeds at impact. This is sledgehammering at its finest."

Does this theory seem sensible? Does the idea of firing the hips/shoulders again before impact increase ball flight distance? How? Could you provide the causal link explanation that I obviously cannot grasp. How does the added mass of the body increase smash factor and produce higher ball speeds?

He stated-: "If your hips and shoulders slow down too early in the downswing (because no one told it to fire again), then naturally conservation of angular momentum takes over and all speed and energy goes to the hands. Voila! We are casting! At the very least, without one's shoulders firing at high speeds at impact, we get a hand flip. It just can't be helped. We flip because we don't fire our hips and shoulders again."

So, do you believe that a failure to fire the hips and shoulders again leads to hand flipping?

Jeff.

Hips going forward . . . vertical forces via the ground . . . swing the arms FAST . . . This dude has something . . . strong on dynamics but weak on geometry . . . the articles on tiger's transition and the arms swing articles are really good.

Yoda 12-20-2008 01:11 AM

Life Of the Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hennybogan (Post 59191)

JEFF,

I've been reading your stuff for a couple of years . . .

Wow, am I ever new to this party! I've been sensing it, but I had no idea.

At the same time, it looks like we're on track pretty quick with this dedicated, quarantined forum.

:salut:

Hennybogan 12-20-2008 01:13 AM

In simplest terms, hit it as low as you can in your downswing and as high as you can in your follow though.

Yoda 12-20-2008 01:16 AM

Lead, Lag and Flail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hennybogan (Post 59196)

In simplest terms, hit it as low as you can in your downswing and as high as you can in your follow though.

Now that sounds interesting!

:golf:

Hennybogan 12-20-2008 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 59195)
Wow, am I ever new to this party! I've been sensing it, but I had no idea . . .

:salut:


I try to keep current. I had Jeff on another forum before. Much disagreement, but an appreciation of the desire for knowledge. Always sorting, with a TGM filter.

Jeff 12-20-2008 01:18 AM

HB

Thanks for commenting. Unfortunately, I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about - I usually need detailed explanations to understand a person's alternative perspective.

Jeff.

Hennybogan 12-20-2008 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 59197)
Now that sounds interesting!

:golf:

I see it in Tiger's iron swings (with a bit of bobbing). The sound of it is something to behold. In slo-mo, you would swear he was hitting the stinger, but in real life, it is the highest, purest shot ever hit. Not that he swings this way all the time.

Yoda 12-20-2008 01:21 AM

Telegraphic Post
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59199)
HB

Thanks for commenting. Unfortunately, I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about - I usually need detailed explanations to understand a person's alternative perspective.

Read the title of my post #7. That's my immediate take. My guess is that it's not far off.

8-)

Hennybogan 12-20-2008 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59199)
HB

Thanks for commenting. Unfortunately, I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about - I usually need detailed explanations to understand a person's alternative perspective.

Jeff.

I'll try to show my perspective over the next few days. I don't think this guy has all the pieces, but he is on to something. I think bucket is sniffing as well.

As I said, always searching though a TGM filter. The geometry never changes. The ball responds to the geometry. Maybe we can stretch the physics.

Hennybogan 12-20-2008 01:36 AM

Bucket
 
Lynn,

You may know that Bucket and I converse frequently. The more we go round, the more we both think that Homer has it, but we are short in understanding his genius.

Homer might not have understood the need for a 200 yard 6 iron hit to the moon, but I think he would have understood how to do it.

Uppndownn 12-20-2008 10:04 AM

Let me know when
 
HB,

Let me know when that draft of your first book is.
I would love to check it out.

UPP in Ohio

CalSr 12-20-2008 05:12 PM

CalSr
 
Creating power gets attention! Could Ben Doyle's reference to snapping the hips have a relationship to this MFT swing?

CalSr

Bagger Lance 12-20-2008 05:44 PM

Ben's Basic Lesson
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CalSr (Post 59214)
Creating power gets attention! Could Ben Doyle's reference to snapping the hips have a relationship to this MFT swing?

CalSr

Exactly what I was thinking big daddy.

When you take a lesson with Ben make sure your belt loops are strong, otherwise they will get ripped off as he teaches you to "hit the ball with your pivot".
We have some video of Ben doing exactly that with a student.

Jeff 12-20-2008 07:59 PM

Bagger - what do you mean when you say "learn to hit the ball with your pivot"?

Consider a pivot-driven swing in a swinger - he uses the pivot to load and release PA#4.

Here is an example of the release of PA#4 - by Ben Hogan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loJJ0qmDQxY

When PA#4 is released in the mid-downswing, the left arm moves towards impact, and then PA#2 and then PA#3 are released passively.

Is that what you mean by "learn to hit the ball with your pivot"?

Jeff.

Yoda 12-20-2008 09:04 PM

Proper Attribution
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59223)

Bagger - what do you mean when you say "learn to hit the ball with your pivot"?

More precisely . . .

What does Ben Doyle mean when he says "learn to hit the ball with your pivot?"

That distinction made, I think you've got the idea.

pistol 12-20-2008 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59223)
Bagger - what do you mean when you say "learn to hit the ball with your pivot"?

Consider a pivot-driven swing in a swinger - he uses the pivot to load and release PA#4.

Here is an example of the release of PA#4 - by Ben Hogan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loJJ0qmDQxY

When PA#4 is released in the mid-downswing, the left arm moves towards impact, and then PA#2 and then PA#3 are released passively.

Is that what you mean by "learn to hit the ball with your pivot"?

Jeff.

Jeff why do you consider Hogan has released all of #4 at this point? Why do you consider Hogan passively releases $3 when he has so much of it to roll out. Ever consider Hogan blew some #3 off earlier?
You insist he is a swinger and does it by the yellow book ( so to speak) but how does this match up to a cp release with an angle hinge orientation ?

Jeff 12-20-2008 10:00 PM

Pistol - I was taught here at this website that PA#4 is completely released when the left arm-chest wall angle is 90 degrees. Hogan achieves that 90 degree release angle by impact, so I presume that he has completely released PA#4 by impact.

It is my personal opinion that Hogan is a swinger - based on watching his swing video many times. If I am correct, then PA#3 release is essentially a passive phenomenon and not due to the active release of PA#1 that thrusts the straightening right arm through impact. If you have reason to believe otherwise, please provide the "evidence" (and the statement "I wish I had three right hands cannot be considered "evidence").

I do not believe that Hogan always used angled hinging, He sometimes employed horizontal hinging. However, I think that he preferred angled hinging because he preferred a power fade shot, rather than a low penetrating draw. I think that he was skilled enough to use either angled or horizontal hinging at will.

Jeff.

pistol 12-20-2008 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59232)
Pistol - I was taught here at this website that PA#4 is completely released when the left arm-chest wall angle is 90 degrees. Hogan achieves that 90 degree release angle by impact, so I presume that he has completely released PA#4 by impact.

It is my personal opinion that Hogan is a swinger - based on watching his swing video many times. If I am correct, then PA#3 release is essentially a passive phenomenon and not due to the active release of PA#1 that thrusts the straightening right arm through impact. If you have reason to believe otherwise, please provide the "evidence" (and the statement "I wish I had three right hands cannot be considered "evidence").

I do not believe that Hogan always used angled hinging, He sometimes employed horizontal hinging. However, I think that he preferred angled hinging because he preferred a power fade shot, rather than a low penetrating draw. I think that he was skilled enough to use either angled or horizontal hinging at will.

Jeff.

Jeff you put up a youtube clip showing Hogan not even close to impact showing release of #4 and now you say he releases all of it by impact...im confused ..seems like you are contradicting yourself now.
Why would hh produce a low draw? and angle h a low fade?
Can you produce footage of Hogan post 1950's using a hh?
Homer says to use elbow plane it requires an earlier release of #3..what would #1 have to do with this and 3 right hands?
What about what Venturi said of Hogan and what he said in the locker room that its elbow to elbow..inferring he paints a dot on the inside of the arm/elbow joint and points it to the sky.
Consider the downswing is over in aprox .3 sec and it takes the brain .2 sec approx to send the signal to the arms/hands would that not make some sense that Hogan actively supinated his left elbow during the downswing which would in turn initiate the #3 release?

Jeff 12-20-2008 11:38 PM

Pistol - that video by Golfbulldog shows that Hogan starts to release at that time point, but release is not completed until impact. What's the contradiction?

HH produces a low draw because the clubface is constantly closing during impact, while AH produces a half-layback situation (halfway between closing and layback) and that produces a a small degree of slice spin due to a small degree of compression leakage.

Where does HK state that using the elbow plane requires an earlier release of PA#3, and what is meant by an earlier release?

In this swing video of Tiger Woods, he is on the elbow plane in the late downswing and he has no problem with a late release of PA#3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meVTld5GvbM

You wrote-: "What about what Venturi said of Hogan and what he said in the locker room that its elbow to elbow..inferring he paints a dot on the inside of the arm/elbow joint and points it to the sky."

I don't know what you are actually describing and I also don't know what point you are trying to make.

You wrote-: "Consider the downswing is over in aprox .3 sec and it takes the brain .2 sec approx to send the signal to the arms/hands would that not make some sense that Hogan actively supinated his left elbow during the downswing which would in turn initiate the #3 release?"

I presume that you made a typo when you stated "elbow" rather than forearm. One cannot supinate the elbow. However, one can perform a supinatory left forearm action. Why should Hogan's left forearm supinatory action need to be active? What's wrong with passive - activated by an assertive torso rotation through the impact zone?

Jeff.

golfbulldog 12-20-2008 11:58 PM

Don't take my edited video out of context!
 
Everybody needs to have their version of 2-R - a get out clause for using images out of desired context!:laughing9

The clip I posted, which Jeff referenced, was meant to show the initial movement of left arm off the chest, with left upper arm not being help tightly to the chest wall.

You can not tell how much acc.4 has released at impact (last frame) because of the video angle.

You can make no conclusion re. wrist motion/acc 3 release from this clip.

pistol 12-21-2008 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59240)
Pistol - that video by Golfbulldog shows that Hogan starts to release at that time point, but release is not completed until impact. What's the contradiction?

Seems to me Jeff you put a video/picture to suit your purpose but how come plenty of other vids/pict of Hogan show other results

HH produces a low draw because the clubface is constantly closing during impact, while AH produces a half-layback situation (halfway between closing and layback) and that produces a a small degree of slice spin due to a small degree of compression leakage.

Jeff you are stating basics..lots of other factors determine ballflight..trackman!!


Where does HK state that using the elbow plane requires an earlier release of PA#3, and what is meant by an earlier release?

somewhere ..surely you got all copies ..read
In this swing video of Tiger Woods, he is on the elbow plane in the late downswing and he has no problem with a late release of PA#3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meVTld5GvbM

Cant be bothered watching the video Jeff cause no comparison to Hogan and he had way less #3 to release and more cf position usually


You wrote-: "What about what Venturi said of Hogan and what he said in the locker room that its elbow to elbow..inferring he paints a dot on the inside of the arm/elbow joint and points it to the sky."

I don't know what you are actually describing and I also don't know what point you are trying to make.

Seems pretty obvious what Venturi said ..check out the ed sullivan show


You wrote-: "Consider the downswing is over in aprox .3 sec and it takes the brain .2 sec approx to send the signal to the arms/hands would that not make some sense that Hogan actively supinated his left elbow during the downswing which would in turn initiate the #3 release?"

I presume that you made a typo when you stated "elbow" rather than forearm. One cannot supinate the elbow. However, one can perform a supinatory left forearm action. Why should Hogan's left forearm supinatory action need to be active? What's wrong with passive - activated by an assertive torso rotation through the impact zone?

No there is no typo error Jeff but i know what you are getting at in terms of medical function ..however Hogan was smarter than you cause he had some #2 left while triggering #3 so his clubface rotation was limited
Jeff.

posted some answers above Jeff

Jeff 12-21-2008 01:49 AM

Pistol

I am willing to participate in a debate where I can get to interchange opinions with a person who describes his opinions in a constructively communicative manner that is designed to enhance understanding of a person's opinions, rather to exhibit "one-upmanship".

A statement like -: "Seems pretty obvious what Venturi said ..check out the ed sullivan show" is not designed to constructively communicate. Nor are these statements-: "somewhere ..surely you got all copies ..read." and "Can't be bothered watching the video Jeff cause no comparison to Hogan and he had way less #3 to release and more cf position usually."

If you are really interested in educating me re: your viewpoint, then you need to provide expansive commentary that makes your viewpoint(s) understandable.

Jeff.

Hennybogan 12-21-2008 02:27 AM

thread jack
 
The link Jeff posted has some interesting stuff to explore. This thread has deteriorated into a run of the mill........

I'd just like to look at the pictures of Tiger and Jamie and try to understand the dynamic that allows them to propel the ball like the giants Hogan talked about in 5 lessons. But these guys don't look like giants....just strong and fast.

It looks to me like Jamie will only get longer as his technique improves.

Anyone see any serious karate chopping down the plane?

Anyone see some hula hula pivot?

Anyone see any maximizing the radius?

pistol 12-21-2008 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hennybogan (Post 59247)
The link Jeff posted has some interesting stuff to explore. This thread has deteriorated into a run of the mill........

What thread jack?? from me ?? should i just read instead ??

12 piece bucket 12-21-2008 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hennybogan (Post 59247)
The link Jeff posted has some interesting stuff to explore. This thread has deteriorated into a run of the mill........

I'd just like to look at the pictures of Tiger and Jamie and try to understand the dynamic that allows them to propel the ball like the giants Hogan talked about in 5 lessons. But these guys don't look like giants....just strong and fast.

It looks to me like Jamie will only get longer as his technique improves.

Anyone see any serious karate chopping down the plane?

Anyone see some hula hula pivot?

Anyone see any maximizing the radius?


Agreed . . . .but before we proceed down that line of thought . . . I think we should state the basic premise of this dude's arguement.

1. He doesn't think "rotary" stuff is "the way it works" at least to hit the ball far.

2. He is advising maximizing vertical forces into the ground vs. just turning or just sliding . . . so slide then push up and turn dynamically.

3. He wants you to swing the arms FAST.

So the question is . . . . is this contradictory to Mr. K . . . I say NO . . . I think it's right in line. There certainly are some things to flesh out.

1. 4-1-2-3 . . .what does that mean in relation to "fast arms" . . . considering Homer said the arms are the power lane?

2. How do you swing your arms fast? Do you just plane turn your pivot into them massive rotor style? Is there arm participation?

3. I think releasing 4-1-2-3 at the proper rate with the pivot has huge on plane functions . ..

Jeff 12-21-2008 12:58 PM

12PB

I don't that you are representing his "core" MFT argument.

His core argument is based on multiple firings - the idea that one should reactivate the hip turn again in the late downswing.

This is what he wrote-: "In a biomechanical graph, this means that Tiger has two velocity peaks for his hips and shoulders. His second hip velocity peak occurs just prior to impact and this "slingshots" his shoulders (2nd firing) into the ball with maximum force."

He is arguing that a second hip velocity peak will "slingshot" the shoulders into the ball with maximum force. Do you buy that argument? Do you believe that slinging your right shoulder into the ball with maximum force (as a second firing) will increase ball speed? If you do, please explain the mechanics.

Jeff.

golfbulldog 12-21-2008 01:27 PM

There is a combination of rotary and vertical movent of the shoulders in the DS, Joe Norwood talked alot about the shoulders acting as pistons driving the arms through impact...ie. vertical not rotary...Norwood may have helped Hogan in the 40s.

If accumulator 4 has started to release...ie left arm is moving down and off the chest... can pivot motion do anything more than divert the path of the arm after release has started? ie. the chest rotation can't push the arm once the arm has left the chest....but the shoulders can move and alter the left arm in a different manner...?maybe redirecting the power package or actually adding force??

Maybe MFT swing starts with rotation and then fires later with vertical...but it is all blended through a general application of force....force is the ultimate result however it is achieved...aligned force.

Hennybogan 12-21-2008 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pistol (Post 59248)
What thread jack?? from me ?? should i just read instead ??

Pistol,

I don't think you jacked the thread. I think you responded the jack. Definitely post.

golfbulldog 12-21-2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfbulldog (Post 59266)
There is a combination of rotary and vertical movent of the shoulders in the DS, Joe Norwood talked alot about the shoulders acting as pistons driving the arms through impact...ie. vertical not rotary...Norwood may have helped Hogan in the 40s.

If accumulator 4 has started to release...ie left arm is moving down and off the chest... can pivot motion do anything more than divert the path of the arm after release has started? ie. the chest rotation can't push the arm once the arm has left the chest....but the shoulders can move and alter the left arm in a different manner...?maybe redirecting the power package or actually adding force??

Maybe MFT swing starts with rotation and then fires later with vertical...but it is all blended through a general application of force....force is the ultimate result however it is achieved...aligned force.

In the edit I did on this youtube:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oh184bHGkpM

Whilst accumulator 4 has not started to release (ie. the initial move before frame by frame segemnt) the left shoulder moves left without much vertical motion...John Schlee (and hence Tom Bertrand) always go on about moving "level left".

Then there is much more vertical motion in the next sgement (frame by frame)...

Obviously it is all blended....but the pivot is much more complicated than just pure rotation. I'm sure that Jeff could do a great job with his Spline tool on the motion of the left shoulder and left knee....maybe "j" shaped...?horizontal during lateral weight shift and preliminary rotation (about 45 degrees) then much more towards vertical when the axis tilt kicks in ???

Maybe?

Jeff 12-21-2008 02:55 PM

GBD

You wrote-: ".but the shoulders can move and alter the left arm in a different manner...? maybe redirecting the power package or actually adding force??"

Let's presume that the right shoulder can add thrust force (push-pressure or added weight) to the right forearm/wrist/hand in the late downswing and at impact. Would it make the ball travel faster?

Not according to this collision review paper.

http://nmgolfscience.tripod.com/collisions.htm

Jeff.

golfbulldog 12-21-2008 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59279)
GBD

You wrote-: ".but the shoulders can move and alter the left arm in a different manner...? maybe redirecting the power package or actually adding force??"

Let's presume that the right shoulder can add thrust force (push-pressure or added weight) to the right forearm/wrist/hand in the late downswing and at impact. Would it make the ball travel faster?

Not according to this collision review paper.

http://nmgolfscience.tripod.com/collisions.htm

Jeff.

I am not saying that the right shoulder adds force through impact resistance...just by increasing arm trhust PRIOR to impact...

If the left arm is blasted off the chest by rotation of pivot...does the left arm continue to accelerate in a pure swing...??

If the left arm is blasted off then is given an extra force prior to impact...will that increase hand speed - and perhaps more imortantly alter hands path - prior to impact resulting in more clubhead speed at impact?

Get a copy of "golf-o-metrics" - it should be part of your journey. If you want to document the perfect swing as well as all swings - as Mac O'Grady wishes to do, by all accounts - then you should at least follow his footsteps to see where he is right or wrong. The book is written by his students...it is very hard to read...makes TGM seem like kindergarten stuff:laughing9

Mac liked Norwood alot (gave him a very complimentary review on his video)...but he apparently gave Joe Norwood a copy of TGM... Mac likes both apparently...

too many "apparently" - I am such a gossip!:laughing9

Jeff 12-21-2008 03:42 PM

GBD

Here is a graph showing the arm speed of an excellent golfer.



Note that arm speed increases after the shoulders decelerate. However, arm speed decreases prior to impact. Note that clubhead speed increases all the way to impact (slope of the clubshaft curve represents its rate of acceleration).

Let's presume that one could prevent the left arm from slowing down in this kinetic sequence by some supplementary biomechanical maneuver (eg. increasing right shoulder thrust). Would that be advantageous and increase clubhead speed at impact?

I think not - because the arms have to slow down to allow for the complete release of PA#2 and PA#3 in a swinger's action. Accelerating the left arm in the late downswing will interfere with the club's release phenomenon, and actually decrease clubhead speed into impact.

I think that the only practical method of increasing clubhead speed is to increase the speed of evolution of the entire kinetic sequence. In other words, Tiger Woods performs this entire kinetic sequence much faster than the average amateur golfer, who is skilled enough to get the kinetic sequence correct.

Where can I get a copy of golf-o-metrics?

Jeff.

12 piece bucket 12-21-2008 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 59263)
12PB

I don't that you are representing his "core" MFT argument.

His core argument is based on multiple firings - the idea that one should reactivate the hip turn again in the late downswing.

This is what he wrote-: "In a biomechanical graph, this means that Tiger has two velocity peaks for his hips and shoulders. His second hip velocity peak occurs just prior to impact and this "slingshots" his shoulders (2nd firing) into the ball with maximum force."

He is arguing that a second hip velocity peak will "slingshot" the shoulders into the ball with maximum force. Do you buy that argument? Do you believe that slinging your right shoulder into the ball with maximum force (as a second firing) will increase ball speed? If you do, please explain the mechanics.

Jeff.

Not sure about all the bursting stuff . . . . I just think the segments in the pivot go from flexion to extension . . . . it's like full lever extension of the pivot . . . extending the segments from the feet all the way through . . . extending the entire radius. Tiger blew out his knee from over-rotation not extension. Sure the shoulders rotate but I think the speed is from the fast arms and the extension . . . .

A lot of this has to do with the sequence with which this happens . . . You can get a transition like Hogan/Sergio but you can't just let the pivot pin the left arm and have it drag it over or under plane . . . .it has to go FAST to stay on the plane. The hands have to go down plane FAST. #4 releasing . ..

12 piece bucket 12-21-2008 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfbulldog (Post 59278)
In the edit I did on this youtube:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oh184bHGkpM

Whilst accumulator 4 has not started to release (ie. the initial move before frame by frame segemnt) the left shoulder moves left without much vertical motion...John Schlee (and hence Tom Bertrand) always go on about moving "level left".

Then there is much more vertical motion in the next sgement (frame by frame)...

Obviously it is all blended....but the pivot is much more complicated than just pure rotation. I'm sure that Jeff could do a great job with his Spline tool on the motion of the left shoulder and left knee....maybe "j" shaped...?horizontal during lateral weight shift and preliminary rotation (about 45 degrees) then much more towards vertical when the axis tilt kicks in ???

Maybe?


Cool . . . you can really see #4 releasing there.

12 piece bucket 12-21-2008 04:12 PM



look similar . . check the extension . . .

This is what this cat had to say about hitting . ..

Two Key Elements in an Elite-Level Swing

What do they really need to do? What do elite level hitters do that young hitters need to learn to do? Simply stated, elite level hitters have learned to (1) generate tremendous explosive power from the middle of their body and (2) use their upper body in the most efficient way to transfer that explosive power to their bat head. In other words, they swing like elite athletes.

Can this swing be taught? More importantly, can your young hitter learn to swing a bat like an elite athlete?

In our experience, the answer is almost certainly no … if they continue doing what 95% of the hitting world – both baseball and softball – from youth league coaches to college and professional coaches - is telling them to do. However … with dedication on the part of both the hitter and his parent or coach and an understanding of the principles and movements taught by Steve Englishbey, we have seen mediocre hitters develop swings that are pretty damn good. And we are pretty damn critical. The success stories are inside this website. We invite you to join our forum, spend some time browsing the website, and take an informed look at whether EnglishbeyHitting swing instruction might be the answer to your young athlete’s hitting aspirations.

http://www.englishbeyhitting.com/index2.html#2keys

golfbulldog 12-21-2008 04:16 PM

I agree with most of your stuff about kinetic sequence. But can I just check that I see the same things as you in that chart?

When you say the shoulders decelerate - do you mean time point green diamond?

I am not convinced that the arm rotational velocity increase much between green diamond and blue circle (time point for max arm speed)... the arm speed trace seems to plateau at about the same time as the shoulder rotation...approximately.

The thorax does increase in rotational velocity after peak pelvis rotational speed - That I do accept.

What interest me is the relative lack of vertical motion in the early DS pivot (top of BS -ie. pre red square - to green diamond) relative to the period in later DS ( green diamond to impact).

This is where the piston shoulder bit comes in I think... as i said earlier - it may be hand path that is effected most...your graph shows rotational speed...the shoulders move less in rotation in some DS segemnts and more in vertical direction it seems ...?

For Joe Norwood material i will PM (it is commercial so can not post on LBG)

12 piece bucket 12-21-2008 04:39 PM

not sure this would translate to golf but pretty interesting . . . maybe swing a dowel fast . . .

http://www.bigcat844.com/increasing_bat_speed.html


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.